• phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 days ago

    The bad thing for the US is that its a lot of revenue to lose. This type of thing has knockon effects. America has a very large tourist hospitality sector.

    Yes, it was promised but the people thinking it a good thing, who voted for it and are implementing it do not understand how the economy works.

    • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      On one hand, it is a lot of revenue lost. On the other, it’s also a lot of resources freed up for Americans that would otherwise have been used by foreign tourists. As long as the supply remains the same and the demand drops, prices should get reduced as well. That’s what people understand.

      What they don’t understand is that companies expect this to be temporary, and they’d rather have losses they can write off, rather than smaller profits that their investors will be upset about.

      • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago
        1. The international demand lost is well beyond what can be replaced with domestic demand. Tariffs are also going to keep prices high so even with a demand reduction that won’t matter to a lot of the supply cost.

        2. The taxes are one thing but less profit and less demand=jobs being cut which has downstream effects. Any smart company doesn’t expect this to be short. Being advised against travel is not something that gets turned around easily.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        What resources are Canadian tourists using that would otherwise go to Americans? I don’t feel deprived of flights to Ottawa…