• originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    imagine how much farther ahead we would be in safety and efficiency if it was made priority 50 years ago.

    we still have whole swathes of people who think that because its not perfect now, it cant be perfected ever.

    • danielbln@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      So uh, turns out the energy companies are not exactly the most moral and rule abiding entities, and they love to pay off politicians and cut corners. How does one prevent that, as in the case of fission it has rather dire consequences?

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I mean it’s not the companies operating the facilities we put our trust in, but the outside regulators whose job it is to ensure these facilities are safe and meet a certain standard. As well as the engineers and scientists that design these systems.

        Nuclear power isn’t 100% safe or risk-free, but it’s hella effective and leaps and bounds better than fossil fuels. We can embrace nuclear, renewables and fossil free methods, or just continue burning the world.

        • The_v@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          The worst nuclear disaster has led to 1,000sq miles of land being unsafe for human inhabitants.

          Using fossil fuels for power is destroying of the entire planet.

          It’s really not that complicated.