• wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    As a non-user of kitty, why did it make you drop tmux? Don’t they do different jobs?

    • Zangoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Kitty has multiplexing built in so it can also replace a lot of what tmux does (unless you’re using tmux over ssh)

    • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Tmux has probably some specific features Kitty won’t do as good as a native multiplexer? (sorry I’m not the right person to ask this question :s) but It has the features I’m looking for without the need to install one.

      It was quite cumbersome to configure a terminal + a multiplexer on MacOS to behave how I liked it. Kitty solved this issue while being fast, simple and a lot of customization in one single app.

      One feature that was really important, copy/past over SSH with Micro which involved quite a hacky thing with iTerm2 + Tmux.Also being able to split my windows, create tabs…

      But as I said I have only basic use cases and can’t really say If Kitty’s multiplexing features are on par with Tmux. However, during my web search I read about a lot of people far more knowledge than myself who actually switch to kitty from Tmux without regrets !