The rebuttal wasn’t as comforting as some are making it out to be. They seem to be more interested in the semantics of it not being a backdoor tied to a specific product, which appears to be true.

Rather it is a potential for vulnerability that exists in all wireless implementation, which seems to me to be a bigger issue.

Even the oldest automatics would let you lock it to a lower gear if you needed it.

Censorship is not just a concept of law.

Steroids aren’t speech.

Must be nice. I can’t even tie my shoes.

It’s not illegal for the other party to include it, but it is absolutely censorship by any definition of the word.

Okay, but what’s the bad part here? That’s just a very generic overview of how donating works.

Need to start spoofing user agent strings again.