This article is about Germany rapidly increasing defence spending, and also the fact that they’re considering conscription. I also found this interesting:

A recent YouGov poll showed that 79% of Germans still see Vladimir Putin as “very” or “quite” dangerous to European peace and security. Now 74% said the same for Donald Trump.

Thoughts?

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Just because you might call yourself militant doesnt mean that you need to querfront with all militants. Militancy is simply a tool.

      • Matombo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        How does a strong military prevent a war? It didn’t work WW1 or 2.

        • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          3 days ago

          I see your attempt of derailing, but I’ll play the game.

          How does appeasement prevent a war? It didn’t work for the First or Second World War.

            • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              You are just naive in thinking that querfronts can prevent a war.

              I never said that I think weapons prevent wars.

              Wars with erratic actors like Putin cannot be prevented, because certainty of peace is built on trust, but Putin cannot be trusted.

                • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The country I live in tries to be prepared for war and so do many countries in Europe.

                  I and my in-group have a lot to lose when countries like Russia, USA or China expand their influence onto Europe, by indirect, hybrid or direct intervention.

                  European society is already split enough, it doesn’t need further authority (from outside).

                  • Matombo@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    I don’t have a solution, but unlike the militarist I don’t pretend to have one.

        • Ooops@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          What does prevent your stuff from getting stolen all the time? Your ability to lock your door and a state-operated police and judical system that oversees the adherence to laws or the sign over your open door that everyone can come in an take your stuff unpunished?

          What does prevent an agressive neighbour with no regards to laws from invading you? The ability to defend yourself making an attempt too costly or your active work on being as helpless as possible and appeasing the aggressor?

          • Matombo@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes a state judical system, but not you holding your neightbor at gunpoint, but that is basically what militarism is advocationg for on an international level.

            If you will you contradicted your 2nd part of your post with the first one.

            • Ooops@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              No, there isn’t a contradiction in the argument. There is one in reality: There is no independent authority (police force/judical system) making countries accountable for breaking the law. We tried to build up something comparable on the judical side of things but those still lack the ability to enforce their rulings.

              So it boils down to “fortifying your door” and being able to defend it against the few people really determined to tear it down.

                • Ooops@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Now you are pretending to be dumb, aren’t you?

                  Being able to properly defend yourself so an aggressor will not risk attacking in the first place will prevent a war.

                  Showing how helpless you are and asking an aggressor nicely to respect that and not invade you will not.

                  It actually is that easy.

                  • Matombo@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    24 hours ago

                    just following your metapher, someone trying to break in is already ww3

                    And hoping that it doesn’t happen just because you have some more tanks is just an unproven naive hope.