This article is about Germany rapidly increasing defence spending, and also the fact that they’re considering conscription. I also found this interesting:

A recent YouGov poll showed that 79% of Germans still see Vladimir Putin as “very” or “quite” dangerous to European peace and security. Now 74% said the same for Donald Trump.

Thoughts?

  • Matombo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    but telling the Ukraine defense that “The only way to win is not to play” is insulting and privileged.

    now you are derailing the argument

    btt

    The equilibrium of MAD (as in “The only way to win is not to play”) might be relevant for countries with nuclear weapons (i.e. Russia, USA, China),

    But all i hear is we need more conventional weapons to defend against russia?

    Still wanna know how that increases the peace?

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Conventional” weapons make a defensive war less deadly to civilians and more expensive for the other side.

      • Matombo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Conventional” weapons make a defensive war less deadly to civilians

        How?

        and more expensive for the other side.

        If this counts then there must be a diplomatic solution mustn’t it? because a war is always more expensive.

        • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          For examply by increased range: Weapons that shoot down rockets/drones before they hit can protect a city or region.

          a war is always more expensive

          Call the Kremlin/White House/Zhongnanhai, I think you’re onto something there.

          “Diplomatic Solution” is only viable if rulers care about pre-war military economics. Authoritarians don’t always do that.

          • Matombo@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            For examply by increased range: Weapons that shoot down rockets/drones before they hit can protect a city or region.

            nothin’ shooting down a nuke, just sain’

            “Diplomatic Solution” is only viable if rulers care about pre-war military economics. Authoritarians don’t always do that.

            so they also don’t care about cost increase afterwards