• rodneylives@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    Something I’ve seen far less reaction to than I expected? While the Switch 2 looks like it takes standard MicroSD cards, it DOESN’T. It takes the fairly obscure MicroSD Express standard! I can’t even BUY an SD Express card locally right now! It seems likely, at launch, that Nintendo’s branded cards will be the only ones people can get that will work with it!

    The Switch 2 has 256GB of onboard storage, much more than the Switch, it is true. But it’s also backwards compatible with the Switch, and lets users bring their old digital library over with them. I have a 256GB card in my Switch, it’s nearly full, and it doesn’t have my whole library on it! If I got a Switch 2, I’d have it filled up on day 1!

    And the MicroSD card issue won’t be obvious to most buyers. Parents will get their kids Switch 2s, and wonder why their old card won’t work with it. It’ll look to them like the Switch 2 or the card is broken, unless they implement a physical lock against incompatible cards, and I don’t know if SD cards even support those. Also, SD Express cards are more expensive than standard ones.

    This could end up being a debacle almost on the scale of the price (which, as others have noted, isn’t even Nintendo’s fault entirely).

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Given the switch2 is going to cost more, definitely.

      Also games are going to be $80 apparently :(

        • Spider89@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yea, except:

          • KDE’s built in screen keyboard is broken (Using Steam’s keyboard). GNOME keyboard does work fine.

          • Autologin is on and screen locking is off due to a broken keyboard.

          • Manual installation if hhd, steam, flatpak, lutris may required a physical keyboard for first setup.

          • KDE wallet is on to protect (non-file) data. (Wifi passwords, chrome/Firefox login, etc…)

          • JamesDSP is used as pulse/easyEffects may need a reset as the audio may “break” when resuming from suspend.

          I didn’t want a non-vanilla Debian system (Bazzite), so I chose to manually install Debian and have a nice Debian setup. Besides those issues, everything works pretty good (no crashes, hiccups.)

          Are you interested in Debian on a legion Go?

    • melfie@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Either that, or the powerful gaming PC you put the Switch 2 money towards that will eventually emulate the Switch 2. Seems like a better investment than buying a locked down console with a GPU less powerful than a RTX 3050 that can only play $80 games.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 days ago

    Are they legit charging money for the tech demo game?

    Also did they mention how much the “upgrades” will be?

    Seems like I’m staying on Steam Deck until that thing wears down into a pile of dust huh.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Also did they mention how much the “upgrades” will be?

      My understanding is it’s $10 for upgrades that just run better with no new content, and $20 for ones that also have new content of come sort. Nintendo’s gonna be the most expensive console to buy games for now. Remember the Switch tax? Get ready for the Switch tariff!

      • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        From what i am reading only mario party jamboree and kirby upgrades will cost money, the zelda ones are free if you pay for switch online and metroid and pokemon dont appear to have any proce attached to their upgrades.

        The running theory is thst most games wont cost to upgrade unless they offer expanded content. But expansions costing money is nothing new.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          if you pay for switch online

          The more expensive Switch Online Expansion Pass, specifically. That’s a big if.

          • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            That’s $4.17 a month. It’s even cheaper if you get a family account and share with your family and / or friends like i do. (I am actually UK, but it seems the US price is the most quoted.) And comes with all the n64 (and the new gamecube) games. Its the cheapest online service of the three main consoles.

            Also, to be clear. Im not a big switch guy, and i think nintendo are a greedy company. I mostly play playstation these days but my switch is handy and there are some amazing first party games.

            • samus12345@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              That’s $4.17 a month.

              …on top of all the other “It’s only $X!” subscription services out there. If it’s the ONLY subscription you have, sure, that’s not bad, but how common is that?

              • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 days ago

                person just unironically said they pay nintendo 5 bucks a month for the privilege to play a curated list of 40 year old games you can quite literally find anywhere online. That’s 60$ a year to access an emulator they probably have less than 10 hours of playtime on. There’s just really no justification for Nintendo anymore, BOTW broke me and I had to be talked into it.

                • samus12345@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  There are other perks, but most of them feel like problems they’re creating and then selling you the solution to rather than genuine value.

                • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Ok. Let’s not misrepresent what i said.

                  Firstly, you dont round up 4.17 to 5.

                  Second. I said i am in the UK, so i dont bay any dollars a month.

                  Third, I pay for 1 quarter of £5 a month, which is the monthly cost of a family account. Which i said i have. So it’s actually £1.25 ($1.64) a month.

                  Forth, The games that come with the expansio are not 40 years old.the expansion gives you the n64, gameboy advance and genesis games, which are 28, 23 and 35 years old respectively.

                  Fifth, as well that i get 48 mario kart maps, as well ss some other games. On top of the online play which you get in the standard pack, and some other bits.

                  Sixth, i have played and completed mario 64 and bajo kazooie on the n64 emulator. I have introduced my son to mario kart 64 as well. I also am slowly working my way through jet force gemini. I have complete goldeneye played multiplayer with my brothers here and there and am working through perfect dark. On the GBA emulator i am playing golden sun. 10 hours is a severe underestimate for all that and more.

                  Finally. If you are salty about BOTW, then thats your problem. But dont go around lying about what i said to make yourself feel better.

  • Leeuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 days ago

    For me, its not the console price thats the problem. £395.99 in the UK but if we consider inflation, the switch 1 would be around £360-365 today. An extra £30ish for a bigger screen and more power is not too unreasonable. Plus ending in 95.99 rather than 99.99 suggests Nintendo have tried to trim the headline price down.

    The real problem is the accessories and games. £75 for new pro controller, £50 for new microSD Express (only ones compatible) £50 for webcam and £67-75 for physical games, £59-£67 for digital.

    Ouch.

    • Natanael@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      It seems like there’s nothing special about the camera, hopefully you could use others.

      The SD Express makes sense, they’re not just upcharging (you can use any manufacturer’s cards), it’s how they guarantee the storage is reliably fast enough for all games to prevent lag in loading speeds

      But for the other accessories, sure. And charging for switch 2 edition upgrades is annoying.

      • fermuch@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        In the nintendo direct, when they were talking about the extra usb-c port, they’ve mentioned it could be used to connect a usb-c camera. Their camera announcement came way later.

        Maybe there is hope?

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 days ago

    Given Nintendos never on sale pricing I cannot commit to this console. God 90 for a game is ridiculous.

    Not to mention their awful peripherals pricing and chatoic lineup.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t actually think that $90 for a game is ridiculous nowadays, if the game has tons of content.

      But a company of Nintendo’s size, with their sales volume, selling a game for $90 when it only has a few hours of content? Fuck off

      They’re like the exact opposite of the spectrum from Minecraft

      • Abnorc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        One thing I can believe is that AAA games have gotten really expensive to make, so it’s not surprising that companies have broken that sort of soft $60 limit that we had for a while. I’m not even against paying more for a good game. When an indie game for $20 can provide over 100 hours of enjoyment, it’s just getting to be a tough sell.

  • Gointhefridge@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    That pricing is really putting Nintendo out of its core market. The reason the Switch was an absolute smash is because it was and remained accessibly priced. The fact they’re charging $450 is really putting them out of the “hey that’s not too bad” audience. This is a wildly bad move on their part.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      The nickel and diming about every single thing they mentioned makes Sony and Microsoft seem generous by comparison.

      Switch 2 announcement in one image:

      The G stands for gamers’ money!

    • carbonari_sandwich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes, it is a price increase, but the inflation has been wild. For context, the Switch in 2017 for $299 is equivalent to $389 in 2025 dollars. It’s really been insane. The Nintendo 64 from 1996 was $199, or $404 in 2025 dollars.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        Consumers also had more buying power back then, so converting the currency doesn’t tell the whole story.

      • Gointhefridge@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        While you’re not literally wrong adjusting for inflation, their “value proposition” is a bit out the window. It’s so close in price to comparable tech, it seems like a much more serious purchase. Nintendo hit it right with the Wii and the Switch by pricing competitively low. The Switch 2 should follow the same value quotient to be a runaway success. This is effectively what killed the Wii U. The Switch 2 could be destined to follow the same fate.

        Even the mental trickery of “$399” would be more effective than “$449” for Nintendo in the long run. They have to question whether that $50 is worth losing marketshare. I think if they are keeping the game prices and (potentially) the cost of services like online higher than the entry point of buying the system should be lower.

      • llii@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        2017 for $299 is equivalent to $389

        Yes, but it doesn’t cost $389 but $450. For $389 I would’ve considered it, bot not $450. Also the bigger issue for me are the game and accessory prices.

  • CosmicJoker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fuck nintendo and those prices.

    7 seas for me.

    $80 lmao and $90 they are insane

    Guess GTA 6 is truly gonna be $100

    • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s 70 and 80 tho?

      And as an old, even with this price increase games are cheap, especially with how much time you get out of them.

      I remember when Mario 3 was 50$ in 1990.

      That’s a 120$ today I think.

      Mario 3 was way easier to make.

      • CosmicJoker@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        What a shit excuse of an argument.

        Nintendo has BILLIONS all these corpos have billions they can keep the $60 price tag.

        But they don’t cause they want MORE while still paying workers shit.

        Maybe YOUR paycheck has keep up with inflation but mine and millions of others sure as fuck hasn’t.

        Either way shits getting modded so I’ll play for free. The switch 1 is the final console for me.

        • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          My point is the prices are down even with the increase.

          Nintendo, unlike Xbox and Playstation, is also one of the few where if things go poorly the management takes pay cuts rather than cutting jobs, and takes risks that justify those reserves if things go really poorly (like the Wii U or GameCube).

          And just as an example of how much lower the price of video games has come:

          If you want to pirate because you can’t afford it go ahead - with how shitty things are in the world, especially the USA, I’m not against it. Heck, if you need a pristine 1st generation Switch (the one that’s super easy to hack without hardware modification) I’d be glad to sell you mine. I use my PC for modded gameplay anyway.

          All I’m saying is the cheap game gravy train could only go on for so long, especially with ever increasing development costs. Nintendo has in part managed to keep those costs down because they’ve kept things at 1080p / 30 (or 24)fps for so long.

          End of the day, your paycheck not keeping up with inflation is your country’s fault, not Nintendo’s. If you live in the USA, you’re definitely angry at the wrong people, since Japan isn’t the one doing tariffs and eroding your worker laws.

            • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Must suck to live with that much spite and anger, and not even do anything productive with it even.

              Hope you get better.

              • CosmicJoker@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Must suck to be an ignorant moron.

                I’m chilling. You the boot licker. Fucking dweeb.

                • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Perhaps you’ve had a rough childhood, but calm, chill people nether react like you do nor speak like you do.

                  Especially when it’s about a luxury product like a videogame. I get that you’re mad you can’t afford it - then simple - don’t buy it. I’m not buying it day one either because of the price, I just accept that I understand why they raised the prices.

                  Like I said, hope you get better.

        • BussyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Nintendo is one of the last game companies that actually release a finished product that’s not filled with micro transactions and your mad that they add an extra $20 to the price of something you will likely put hundreds of hours in as prices of everything have increased. Would you rather they release it for $60 but you have to pay an extra $5 for each character/vehicle/map like all the American companies are doing it

          • CosmicJoker@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Another fucking bootlicker. Bitch please tell me how much dick you suck to defend Nintendo?

            #blocked.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      At least this game may be worth it if it’s $/h.
      Nintendos game might be <40hours long of pure campaign (excluding open world games like pokemon)

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I don’t want that kind of pricing to be encouraging because if we’re paying per hour of campaign then Civ would be $6K and even something like Kingdom Come Deliverance would be $400

        I don’t have that kind of money.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          You can’t compare open end games like Minecraft and Civ with a mainly story based game like GTA.
          What you do after the campaign is your issue.
          I just say that it’s understandable if you compare it to traditional media.

          I will maybe buy it once it’s on sale.
          No way in hell will I buy it for full price lol.

          And the price creep will come because you and me are a very quiet minority in comparison to the casual games that buy a nee console solely to play the newest GTA or CoD.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            That’s why I didn’t pick Minecraft, Civ has a story mode and KCD is all about its story, just like GTA.

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Didnt even know Civ had a story. Only played Civ6 and didnt really bother looking to hard as I just expected a turn based strategy game.

      • CosmicJoker@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s encouraging prices to sky rocket.

        Holy shit yall truly boot lick so hard.

        10000% GTA6 will be $100 if Rockstar reads any of these posts.

        Setting a bad precedent.

  • Penguinz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Console price doesn’t bother me so much, but these game prices really instantly killed my hype. Can’t wait to not buy the Wii U 2

  • Vari@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Can’t wait to never buy one. My switch has tears and BOTW on it, and those are the last games I’ll buy from Nintendo so…

      • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        7 days ago

        Because they are one of the most consumer hostile gaming companies. The only redeeming quality is their games are usually top notch. I personally refuse to give them any more money.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          Their games are usually top notch and their hardware is usually more cheaply priced. Not this time.

      • Penguinz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        7 days ago

        Same reason the ps3 fumbled the announcement and failed at launch. They got too greedy

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Because their only saving grace up until this point has been relatively cheap consoles.

      • Abnorc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Nintendo has been pushing the limits of how far it can make things worse for their customers, and people are still locked in because of some of the first party franchises. (Zelda, Mario, Pokémon, etc.)

        Frankly, I’m surprised that Nintendo fans aren’t more mad.

  • MECHAGODZILLA2@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I have never purchased a game at $70 so for $80 they can be sure as shit I am hard noping out of this one. I was a day 1 3DS (ambassador club!) and Wii U buyer. Really hope this backfires, so incredibly stupid

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      What’s the source for the $80 thing? If it’s in the article I’m missing it.

      • TAG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        Nintendo US website. Mario Kart has an MSRP of $79.99. Donkey Kong has an MSRP of $69.99.

          • Kelly@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            In Australia we had an au$90 price tier with only 6 titles:

            • Breath of the Wild
            • Pokkén Tournament DX
            • Fire Emblem Warriors
            • Xenoblade Chronicles 2
            • Super Smash Bros Ultimate
            • Tears of the Kingdom

            All their other AAA titles were au$80, for example:

            • Super Mario Kart 8 Deluxe
            • Animal Crossing: New Horizons
            • Super Mario Odyssey
            • Pokémon Sword/Shield or Scarlet/Violet
            • Super Mario Party / Superstars / Jamboree
            • New Super Mario Bros. U Deluxe / Super Mario Wonder

            Then smaller releases were placed at $70, for example:

            • 1-2-Switch
            • Go Vacation
            • Fitness Boxing 2/ 3
            • Miitopia
            • WarioWare: Get It Together / Move it

            You can see they used the $90 tier quite aggressively early in the piece and then scaled back significantly with almost 5 years between Smash Bros and Tears of the Kingdom.

            At the same time they made sure the Marios (Kart, 3d, 2d, Party, Sports), Pokemons and other franchises with broad all-ages appeal were priced in the middle at $80.

            To be honest I’m a bit worried about the pricing for Super Mario Kart World, the previous one was the beat selling Switch title and if they come out of the gate with high sales they may take the wrong lessons and try to lock in that au$120 price (a 50% increase!).

            On the other hand they may just be price anchoring with the bundle. Having the standalone console priced at au$700 and the bundle at au$770 will let the consumer find ways to justify the purchase, they might say the console is worth $700 so the game is only $70, or they might argue the game is $120 so the console is really only $650. Either way will make them feel better about giving Nintendo the money.

            I suppose the best outcome for the consumer would be for most people to get SMKW in the bundle and then hopefully the next title they release at that price point has lacklustre sales. If they see they sell more units at a lower price it can be a good outcome for everyone.

  • redwattlebird@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Until March 31st, 2026, the GameChat system will be available for free for all Switch 2 owners

    Is this so they can lock it behind the subscription after this? Along with all the other new features, not worth it for me. Getting the steam deck once I can’t get anymore physical games on the switch 1.

    • Natanael@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I hope they at least allow gamechat to be used for free locally, and by that I specifically mean allowing the camera stuff to be active (like if you plug in a small USB C camera in portable mode, maybe even if you sit in wireless range but in different rooms)

  • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    the size of the framebuffer has nothing to do with how much power the device has to fill it up.

    Even the crappiest integrated gpu is “4k” capable

  • Lightor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Man I’ve just forgotten about Nintendo at this point. Microsoft and Sony get that exclusives aren’t working when people don’t have enough money to buy every system anymore. I see Nintendo as a niche console with a handful of games. There’s just not enough to justify buying one, and I grew up on Zelda and Metroid. I love them, but it’s not worth buying another console for a few high priced games with questionable performance.

    • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      The Switch has sold more than the PS5 and Xbox Series X/S combined. Very “niche”

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Cool. And Sony can sell to PS and PC, same with Xbox. They have two markets, one that they don’t have to support with hardware. They can also make games that look nice and run nice because they have much better hardware. Plus they actually do cross play with each other, making bigger player pools for match making and such.

        We’re not talking about consoles sold. I’m talking about game choice and experience. If you want to look at how you can play the games, there are a few more PCs than Switches sold.

        But sure, Mario Party is fun every so often.

        • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Best selling PS5 game: Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 @ 11 million

          9th best selling Switch game: Super Mario Party @ 21.1 million

          Super Mario Party Jamboree released in October and already sold over 6 million.

          But sure, I guess Nintendo is the niche one

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Cool and how many games are there on the system? With no backwards compatibility for these expensive games? How many shooters are popular on switch? Or is it that they lock down their IP and it’s marketed strongly towards children and cashing in on nostalgia.

            But sure, nuance doesn’t matter. Nintendo is clearly the best system with the best games. I wonder how gaming PCs are even selling anymore, no one even should be playing on anything else it’s so obviously good. Jesus…

    • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      What exactly do you consider high priced? $60 for a game that you end up playing for 10 hours is only $6 an hour. Compared to the price of a movie ticket, that’s pretty cheap entertainment.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        You can try to rationalize it all you want, bottom line is people don’t have money to buy $80 games these days. Those people aren’t going to the movies either.

        I bought a rug that I’ve gotten years of value out of, should it have been thousands of dollars then? The idea that time used is how you measure value is flawed.

        Edit: look what popped up on my feed, so looks like it’s not just me

        https://tech.yahoo.com/gaming/articles/former-blizzard-boss-says-hard-090054442.html

        • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean, yeah, I never said it was a perfect basis for measuring the value of games or anything else in the world. It’s just one metric, and by that measure it’s a pretty good value for time of enjoyment. Congrats on the rug bro.

      • Abnorc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        As far as games go, it’s still a lot. I’ve played some $20 games for hundreds of hours. Not a dealbreaker, and I’ll gladly buy the game if it looks fun. On the other hand, the games generally being expensive is not a selling point for the console.