• Omgboom@lemmy.zip
    34·
    6 days ago

    This is why they should be drinking their own cum, it’s a huge testosterone boost

  • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    25·
    6 days ago

    As an alpha male, I can only cum when I look at another alpha male straight in the eyes while holding an alpha male’s cock in each of my hand. We call it T-blast, you need to do it at least twice a week to keep your level high.

    • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      8·
      6 days ago

      That was kind of what I got out of this. Are there straight guys out there who really don’t like eating pussy?

      • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
        6·
        6 days ago

        A buddy of mine. Just refuses to. Never elaborated, I didn’t ask. Probably part of why his marriage didn’t last.

        By that logic, my deep love for the act should ensure mine will last forever.

      • rational_lib@lemmy.world
        71·
        6 days ago

        It used to be a racial thing, like only white guys would do it. Probably has to do with the hyperactive degree of masculinity signalling in black and hispanic cultures, at least back in the gangsta rap era. Now we’re in the age of white Republican masculinity signalling, so I guess it’s their thing now.

        I will say from back in the days of yore when a girl would let me anywhere near her it did strike me as a bit gross, but I did enjoy seeing her enjoy it. I think the fact that it’s a bit gross and she enjoys it means it’s kind of subservient, so you can’t be an alpha male if you do it. Says a lot about how so much of this sort of fundamentalist masculinity culture is pretending about what men want rather than being about what men really want.

        That’s a much bigger topic though.

        • skisnow@lemmy.caEnglish
          6·
          6 days ago

          It was a major plot point on one of the seasons of The Sopranos. Junior ordered a hit on Tony Soprano after Tony found out that Junior ate pussy and teased him for it.

          Of all the notions that exist around hypermasculinity, this one is the weirdest.

        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          4·
          6 days ago

          There’s also that these men hate women who enjoy sex, “giving head” is considered to be only enjoyable to one party by some, and thus bad if the woman enjoys it. Some of them even describe asexuality as what normal should be for woman, but still do it for men.

          Weirdly enough some more “hypersexual” women don’t necessarily want it, and instead weirdly obsessed with “mutual pleasure”.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    27·
    7 days ago

    Yes, please do us all a favor and only have gender affirming manly sex with other mysoginist dudes

  • Ilixtze@lemm.eeEnglish
    18·
    6 days ago

    I joked around 10 years ago that the ultimate Leftie Psy-op would be convincing chuds that straight sex makes you gay.

  • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    21·
    6 days ago

    I dunno, I feel pretty manly when I make a woman cum.

    So by extension, listening to women and being attentive is also manly.

      • Agent641@lemmy.world
        7·
        6 days ago

        When you let a woman talk, and you listen attentively to her, she is verbally topping you, making you a sissigaeboi. It’s very manly and secure to shout over women whenever they speak to force their word-penises out of your ears (the buttholes of the brain). Don’t get earcucked, fellas.

      • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
        5·
        6 days ago

        Ohhhhh, I see it now.

        Here I was thinking all these other commentators were crazy. Thanks for the heads up.

        Guess I’m gay. 🤷‍♂️

        • udon@lemmy.world
          3·
          6 days ago

          Guess I’m gay. 🤷‍♂️

          Being so direct and manly about this and acknowledging your gayness actually makes you an alpha cis male again

        • some_random_nick@lemmy.world
          1·
          6 days ago

          In this case, the top post responded to the embeded post, which is a resposne to another smaller embeded post. You would find the top post and read the smallest embeded post and walk you way back up. After that you read everything top to bottom as usual.

        • Landless2029@lemmy.world
          1·
          6 days ago

          I’m the wrong person to ask!

          I’ve read it several ways the the bottom one last is the funniest/saddest read.

          Brainrot all the way down…

  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.netEnglish
    241·
    7 days ago

    Can anyone explain the phrase “hence thousand year prohibition against it”?

    Like, I see the Musk-y tweet style, where apparently articles like “a” and “the” aren’t worth your big boy genius brained time, but what is the prohibition? Dude just drops that like everybody knows what he’s talking about, but what the actual fuck is he talking about?

    God, it’s such an arrogant, lazy way of talking, I fucking hate these incel shitheels. They’re actually confused why women won’t touch them? Jesus.

    • Jayjader@jlai.luEnglish
      17·
      7 days ago

      Unironically: the patriarchy. “Women and sex exist to serve men’s interests” thus, pleasuring a women in a manner most often associated with that of a man being pleasured by a women (oral sex aka blowjobs here) is ceding too much power to women.

      They’re actually confused why women won’t touch them? Jesus.

      My thoughts exactly.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.netEnglish
        4·
        7 days ago

        Yes, agreed, but “thousand year prohibition” is so specific. Like that must refer to something, and I’m really curious about what.

      • constnt@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
        1·
        6 days ago

        It’s more insidious than that. They want to create a cast of men who have no sense of community or connection to anyone. Removing this connection makes it easier to radicalize these young men. You replace their sense of connection to their community and family with a connection to the patriarchy or dear leader or some other religious figure.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      11·
      7 days ago

      Romans found it distasteful, and iirc it’s a thing for machismo-addled men in Italy to this day. (Berlusconi’s administration lead to spikes in DV/SA - when your president is gleefully fucking teenage girls, it tends to damage your society. One could look into how Trump has made outright expressions of misogyny acceptable again…)

      A lot of these alt right weirdos subscribe to this weird Roman sexual ethics. It’s all about who’s in charge, who the sex is for. It’s okay to penetrate “lessers” - for Nick Fuentes to top his puppy femboys or for Alex Jones’s phone to be loaded with porn of trans women. The aspect of power and hate adds to the sex for them. (In a world where LGBT people don’t have employment protections, there’s a lot more “trade” too…)

      They also see this as the way that everyone else understands sex too. Giving head to someone is submitting to them, and men don’t submit to women.

      • CalipherJones@lemmy.worldEnglish
        4·
        7 days ago

        Romans also shared a sponge on a stick to wipe their ass at the public restrooms. Doesn’t take much imagination to wonder why people didn’t go down on each other regularly.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.netEnglish
        3·
        7 days ago

        This definitely plays into something I’ve been thinking about lately - in a conservative worldview, all sex is rape, of a woman by a man. Whether it’s acceptable to them is all about ownership. Does that man have the right kind of ownership over that that woman? If so, they’re fine with it. If not, it’s bad.

        This is also related to the idea that no woman ever actually wants sex, and no man ever doesn’t want it. It’s all about when it’s allowable for him to overpower her.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          6·
          7 days ago

          This is exactly what Andrea Dworkin was saying in Intercourse. Calling it out explicitly was such a threat to conservatives like Rush Limbaugh that they had to turn it into “this crazy lesbian feminist said all sex is rape!”

          A human being has a body that is inviolate; and when it is violated, it is abused. A woman has a body that is penetrated in intercourse: permeable, its corporeal solidness a lie. The discourse of male truth - literature, science, philosophy, pornogra-phy-calls that penetration violation. This it does with some consistency and some confidence. Violation is a synonym for intercourse. At the same time, the penetration is taken to be a use, not an abuse; a normal use; it is appropriate to enter her, to push into (“violate” the boundaries of her body. She is human, of course, but by a standard that does not include physical pri-vacy. She is, in fact, human by a standard that precludes physical privacy, since to keep a man out altogether and for a lifetime is deviant in the extreme, a psychopathology, a repudiation of the way in which she is expected to manifest her humanity.

          There is a deep recognition in culture and in experience that intercourse is both the normal use of a woman, her human potentiality affirmed by it, and a violative abuse, her privacy irredeemably compromised, her selfhood changed in a way that is irrevocable, unrecoverable. And it is recognized that the use and abuse are not distinct phenomena but somehow a synthesized reality: both are true at the same time as if they were one harmonious truth instead of mutually exclusive contradictions.

          Like - yes! A lot (not all) of heterosexual men see sex as domination, as something they have to “get” from partners who might not be eager or willing. The idea that women actually enjoy sex is not supposed to be a part of it. Think about how absolutely frothingly buttmad conservatives got over W.A.P.

          Also all of the common Christian preaching about how wives need to ensure that all of their husbands “needs” are met. If she doesn’t put out, it’ll be her fault when his eyes go wandering (whether it lands on a man or a woman or a child). A young Christian girl is to remain pure until she is married and then immediately cater to all of her husbands sexual demands - at no point is she supposed to develop her own ideas about sexual pleasure. (The things Mark Driscoll was telling his congregation both in person and anonymously online are so fucked up.)

          Sex is such a powerful instinct that people who want to control others are going to spend a lot of effort working on systems to control sex.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.netEnglish
            2·
            6 days ago

            “this crazy lesbian feminist said all sex is rape!”

            Not all sex, just all the sex in their world. So by saying it was “all sex” they were kind of telling on themselves by agreeing.

            I should probably read that book, thanks for that.

    • JackbyDev@programming.devEnglish
      8·
      7 days ago

      They’re either making stuff up or probably talking about how some culture or religion supposedly banned cunnilingus for a thousand years, or at least considered it taboo.